Forwandert
Lieutenant-General
The paper background on the app version just doesn't look finished with any definition. I think they would look slightly better matched to the messages tab where each line is defined a little more.
I did say "probably mostly freeriding dinosaurs". I'm well aware that some of the most active dinosaurs have spent enormous amounts of money on the game.
Anyway getting pretty fed up with being the target of bad programming - time to go eat some leafy ferns or whatever dinosaurs should be eating.
I've just checked the stats on my main server - someone did over 5000 fights again yesterday - so that delay nerf worked well didn't it?
I hate to say it, but WE TOLD YOU SO!
You can do fights without doing RQ's.
Everybody keeps going on that the delay has to do with cheaters. That is a player thought. Inno never stated that to be the reason for it.
You can do fights without doing RQ's.
Everybody keeps going on that the delay has to do with cheaters. That is a player thought. Inno never stated that to be the reason for it.
Inno did state the reason for it - check the beta forum.
[/URL]
Yes, that is one CM saying: " to prevent exploiting of the recurring questline".
Doing the UBQ over and over again, by clicking manually can also be considered exploiting that quest. Nowhere does it mention cheating, macros or quests in SAAB as people seem to think. This isn't the first attempt to make doing RQ's less profitable, but nobody seems to see that.
If this is an attempt at making RQs less profitable, tell that to the guys doing over 5000 fights every day. Inno must think we're stupid.
Do they have to do the RQ';s, to make it possible to do that number of fights?
I am a top 10 fighter with an amazingly powerful army, and the best I have managed in 12 hours of play is 2000 fights and that required plenty of RQs. You might be able to do double that, but not every day.
I could easily - but only if I had people setting up loads of armies for me to hit in GvG. Every day. My guildmates would soon tire of that. And besides, the players I'm talking about are doing more than double that.So you can not do 2000 fights without doing the RQ's?
I could easily - but only if I had people setting up loads of armies for me to hit in GvG. Every day. My guildmates would soon tire of that. And besides, the players I'm talking about are doing more than double that.
GbG is also very popular for farming fights, tho you need to invest resources to be able to steadily fight (goods for building SCs, for example). Before SAAB arrived, I noticed that number of fights blasted for some top players. GvG is also a good source for farming fights, but not so popular anymore.
Fighting through a RQ, then aborting it, just don't give you any actual benefits for your city, GbG can at least give you that, and benefits are very juicy (it is, in my opinion, best source of FPs that makes the grind of attack boost even more worth it). RQs are useful if you complete them, that's why players skyrocket their CF. Tho, even with the latest update and the additional delay, you can still do something and gather quite some resources using RQs, but just aborting them without actually getting reward just to get ranking points is...well not worth it.Exactly - it's the investment required that limits the fights in GbG (and GvG to some extent)
Doing many thousands of fights in a day is possible, but not sustainable without RQs. Let's not get nit-picky about it. We all know that is true.
Fighting through a RQ, then aborting it, just don't give you any actual benefits for your city, GbG can at least give you that, and benefits are very juicy (it is, in my opinion, best source of FPs that makes the grind of attack boost even more worth it). RQs are useful if you complete them, that's why players skyrocket their CF. Tho, even with the latest update and the additional delay, you can still do something and gather quite some resources using RQs, but just aborting them without actually getting reward just to get ranking points is...well not worth it.