There won't be anymore because of the reasons given in the GBg announcement. Only question I ask myself is why list cartography as a problem when there is still Antartica for AF/OF/VF and then each space age can host its own GvG map on its (dwarf) planet?is there a new GvG map ?
wait no ...of course not ...
= total underwhelm again .
The day is correct and will go to all servers on May 28th.
As most of you know from playing beta, one of our game designers did indicate the GB would be changed to remove PvP. That post was only made this past Friday and did say expect to hear more in the coming weeks. This means that yes, they will go live as is, and any changes will come later. The beta post. https://forum.beta.forgeofempires.c...go-project-stargazer.10335/page-10#post-81455
Also, for the curious on the already released expansion. This was released with the 1.45 update. The victory expansion was released then for a cost of 950,000 medals.
@Lady Marlena why is this update going live if fundamental changes to the GBs are planned alter? The feedback to the post you referenced has been met with overwhelmingly negative response from the beta community too. It's a huge risk now to put any investment into new GBs if there is a high probability of significant changes. If something isn't right, why wasn't it addressed on beta first? What is the point of beta if it doesn't form a useful test/feedback/change cycle?
is there a new GvG map ?
wait no ...of course not ...
= total underwhelm again .
ok so my question is as follows:
since mars ore is only available on the new global map will players who have advanced to SA:M have access to it even if they have not finished the VF global map?
Are you new?
This is how it always works. Beta is only to see if new things work. Player feedback does not matter.
will be nerfedThis is not always true. In this case, the VP has been nerfed because of players's feedback on the Beta forum.
will be nerfed
in a few weeks
but it will be released in the original version next week
Isn't it a shame when some people only come to the boards to ridicule other people's posts and not to add anything constructive to the debate. I guess it makes them feel clever.
In my opinion releasing stuff on beta that could be nerfed in the future is fine.; that's what beta testing is all about. It should be rare to have to make changes once something has been released on the live servers, and releasing something which is known to be wrong should never happen.
Am I new? Far from it.
Arctic Future Goods will be used to send the Arctic Harbor Ship to collect Promethium, which is also needed as a Special Goods for some of the Space Age - Mars Tech Tree (oh and you will also need AF Goods to repair your Arctic Harbor ship as well when it gets damaged)Ok, so that begs another question - what good are AF goods in Space Age Mars, given you now need Mars Ore to be able to create Mars Goods?
@Lady Marlena why is this update going live if fundamental changes to the GBs are planned alter? The feedback to the post you referenced has been met with overwhelmingly negative response from the beta community too. It's a huge risk now to put any investment into new GBs if there is a high probability of significant changes. If something isn't right, why wasn't it addressed on beta first? What is the point of beta if it doesn't form a useful test/feedback/change cycle?
This is not always true. In this case, the VP has been nerfed because of players's feedback on the Beta forum.
Will any goods be of use from previous era's? I have several special buildings producing goods. Will they become useless?
It isn't. It will still go unnerfed to the live servers. After that it will be nerfed. Players that do not know that are in for a nice surprise.