And let me guess they are at the bottom of your neighborhood ?
Honestly I think the problem would always be - the game was designed with ARCs in mind. We'd never get enough BP/FP to level GB's high without it.Interesting idea, Inno has done this before in Tribal wars where they had worlds set up with different playing options, some had certain things removed, some were faster a few even eliminated Key things introduced. So its not that silly a suggestion.
The two biggest game changers were Traz and Arc and certainly I think the ARC spoiled the game and it would have been better without it, So I agree have one world with no arcs, what harm can it do?
So last time before arc existed, the levelling requirements are much lower?Honestly I think the problem would always be - the game was designed with ARCs in mind. We'd never get enough BP/FP to level GB's high without it.
It being high makes everything else high.
The game was better before it of course, but now that it exists it sort of relies on it. A world with no arcs would need to have the other GB re-designed to be suited with the fact that no one is boosting their rewards.
Either that or put the max on GB to 10 and GG the arc is useless
actually notHonestly I think the problem would always be - the game was designed with ARCs in mind.
Pretty sure that GB's above your age are not such big game changes as Traz and Arcs are. In my previous guild we would give TRAZ and ARCS to every player who joined (and proved would fight) no matter their age because of the power they gave to players in GvG and GbGThat or just no GBs above your current age.