Since I was on a roll here, can I now call you on this? The wording was *not* accurate, as you could not *bag* the Viceroy from the main prize line. You can bag frags, and need to bag three sets of those for one upgrade. As has also been demonstrated throughout this month, the announcements and explanations needed *way* more effort than was put into them. Moderators asked us to hold back and give feedback about the event, yet those explanations and misleading wordings are as much part of the event as the attempted game play. There is such a thing as false advertising, and also such a thing as hyping something to be too good and hence causing disappointment. Be careful not to cause too much disaffection by going for either.The wording is accurate
‘Could‘ being the operative word here. Assuming no shuffles or show twos on the board, and only 5 doubloon incidents, you would not average a sufficient amount of progress to get 3 sets of the frags. Luck based, as was stated by others too. I’m not against incentives to spend or work towards something, but a simple nod to ‘you can get parts of the kit easily and will have to pay special attention to getting all 3’ would not have gone amiss. Like it wouldn’t have been too hard to simply say in the announcement that people wouldn’t get a calendar key on every board. So they would have *known*, before they decided on which strategy to use. I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect that people have to figure out from third party sources who have tested the event before if what they are told in the game announcement they can do, is not possible.you could indeed bag it.
1) The first Grand Prize does not require progress, so that is not correctNo Grand Prizes are guaranteed if you don't progress far enough to win them. That's nothing new