For example, if I was fighting in the EMA on Guild Wars, I might put up trade for EMA<->IA and EMA<->HMA goods on the market (at a fair ratio) to obtain some EMA goods for myself.
From my point of view, the idea is not to bring goods into the guild treasury, but to bring goods to the individual player. And the benefit is to the guild, in that profiteering doesn't get confused with intra-guild trade :-)I don't really see the point of this to be honest. If you are needing a certain aged good for guild treasury then how come you have guild members with ample of the good to take the trades? If they don't want to donate but will give you the goods then why does it matter where they came from?
Neutral (till I understand it better)
+1 I like the idea because I've also tried trading on the open market, where my ratio between goods of 1 age is not the obligatory 2 for 1 deal. Since most guild members only believe that 2 for 1 trading is fair - because that's what they've been told - I've been shot down in flames. This is because guild members can still see my trades in the 'guild-only' list, even though I did not list my trades as 'guild-only.'Not as I read it, but I've occasionally been wrong :p
The second idea was about the people viewing other guild members' trades on the market - seeing which ones were posted just for their guild.
This is approaching trades from the other side - controlled by the person setting up the trades. This is a setting where you could in effect "hide" trades from your guild. For most fair trades this sounds like an odd idea - for sure - but for the purposes of bringing a certain type of goods into your guild from outside it then it seemed the most logical solution.
Then why mark it down if you don't have a reason to?-1. I don't know the exact reason, but I do not think this idea is so useful.