DeletedUser97836
Against
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
DeletedUser
Against
DeletedUser6065
For . . . mk
DeletedUser103192
Against
DeletedUser
I'm against it!
DeletedUser5647
For..
DeletedUser
ouron, you didn't count my vote on page 9 :\
DeletedUser
Against!
DeletedUser1009
Aginst guild hopping 45 day restriction. 7 days is a makes little difference.
DeletedUser1009
Against guild hopping. 45 day restriction at minimum should be imposed.. 7 days is a makes little difference.
DeletedUser4879
Against guild hopping...
DeletedUser12400
Some players vote against guild hopping not against guild hopping cool-down. Just make sure you get it right.
DeletedUser97883
Voting against cool-down.
DeletedUser
Against cool down
DeletedUser105579
I'm For
DeletedUser100421
I'm for
DeletedUser13082
You realise that this update was implemented almost a year ago now?
DeletedUser99588
You realise that this update was implemented almost a year ago now?
and yet it still happens.
DeletedUser
If it is needed players should post inthe ideas section and the game discussions, but there are some threads wich do not require discussions. But I am still against, because from ancient times the roman forum and today's internet forum are for discussions - I vote against.
Share: