Powe
Brigadier-General
What sort of poll?
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
- Status
TheKingOfKool
General
somebody start one - let's see what happens
DeletedUser109867
I have a theory. People have been complaining for a long time that some players stay in low Ages and build big wonders etc so too strong for their level. there is Actually no incentive in the game to age up, and the opposite Is actually true. So inno change pvp to give everyone a reason to age up now to compete as you are fighting higher ages. The feedback they keep talking about but won’t tell us is not feedback about pvp but the feedback on players staying down Ages, which they have fixed With this and it would be why they won’t tell us the feedback.
If right that means they will eventually change gbg and gvg to do the same. If I am wrong inno tell us the real reason. Lack of facts means we will develop our own theories
If right that means they will eventually change gbg and gvg to do the same. If I am wrong inno tell us the real reason. Lack of facts means we will develop our own theories
Herugul
Private
For the easy option I sometimes get offered anything down to EMA (I am in PME on my main world), which is a not any challenge at all, for medium I usually get an opponent 1-3 Ages above me, which is just doable if they have pathetic bonuses and for Hard I usually get Space Age Mars or Asteroid, which is so impossible it is laughable.
For rating whether Easy, Medium or Hard it should limit to no more than 1 Age for Medium, no more than 2-3 down for Easy and no more than 3 or 4 Ages up for Hard. I have good bonuses all above 100% and Hard should be that but not totally impossible.
For rating whether Easy, Medium or Hard it should limit to no more than 1 Age for Medium, no more than 2-3 down for Easy and no more than 3 or 4 Ages up for Hard. I have good bonuses all above 100% and Hard should be that but not totally impossible.
Thunderdome from Beta
Private
Don't know how things are here, but in the beta forum, a poll gets shot down the moment it is put up because they feel it's redundant or something to that effect since they have a feedback thread.
Goremise
Lieutenant-General
tbh though, the rewards are mostly ignorable and really, the medals was not really why people enjoyed the better continent map pvp towers.
So this only negatively effects campers because they made the choice to remove the old towers. If they had stayed then everything would have been fine.
But for some stupid reason Inno devs think we need the top player to be top somewhere else
Knight of ICE
I am pretty sure the same might happen here.
FantasticMrFrank
Brigadier-General
Think people in the low ages will just stay as they are and take what rewards they already get from GE, GBG, GVG, it would take to much time to get to SAAB from Ema for instance,, if anything less people will play the PvP feature the costs out weigh the benefits to even try and compete with the Top End players to what they are probably already getting
joestalin
Private
Yes - this arrogant response from a Forum Moderator is the thing in a nutshell, and thanks for that, it really makes it easier to leave this game. "We alone know" is the motto for INNO - goodbye and no thanks
TheKingOfKool
General
1 Spear fighter against user - ranked 12, 457Meg rank points (world-A) - I almost got off the starting line - lost 200 - lol - and he is still at the top of my battle list - it doesn't get any fairer than that - does it? SAAB opponent with 315%/2025% - and of course - nails to defend & attack with - Now I ask you all - what do we have to complain about - we are all just a bunch of babies --- where's that song I have
TheKingOfKool
General
Using us to "Gather Additional Information" and happily taking everyone's medals, troops, diamonds, & money.
And they do it without shame. Now how could that have anything wrong with that -
At least in beta everybody gets a few thousand diamonds to play with - where's ours?
And they do it without shame. Now how could that have anything wrong with that -
At least in beta everybody gets a few thousand diamonds to play with - where's ours?
FantasticMrFrank
Brigadier-General
I’d go for the tavern boost aswell and say a prayer or two
TheKingOfKool
General
I’d go for the tavern boost aswell and say a prayer or two
That little spear chucker needs the strength of Samson and the Jawbone of an Ass - what do you think - maybe then - LOL
r21r
Major-General
who told you that we are not beta ?
i reached 7.500 CP in EMA and i start losing troops and having HMA-LMA as easy option, i got ranked ~2.200 among 2.500 total players and i think that the troop costs are starting to be over my affordable expenses, but that world is only a diamond farm with 100% attack and +4 troops daily from the villa.
maybe stronger EMA campers could reach 1000 ranking who knows - depends the world
i don't find the new feature a must, i will always do fights as long as i don't lose troops but up to there..
i prefer GvG as it is more "player vs player"
Jouchka
Private
For devs it might be fun to develop such horrible thing.
Jouchka
Private
This is exactly the reason why I exitted the game 1,5 year agoo, for one year. Now I'm back for a while and can just see the same crap happening
TheKingOfKool
General
who told you that we are not beta ?
i reached 7.500 CP in EMA and i start losing troops and having HMA-LMA as easy option, i got ranked ~2.200 among 2.500 total players and i think that the troop costs are starting to be over my affordable expenses, but that world is only a diamond farm with 100% attack and +4 troops daily from the villa.
maybe stronger EMA campers could reach 1000 ranking who knows - depends the world
i don't find the new feature a must, i will always do fights as long as i don't lose troops but up to there..
i prefer GvG as it is more "player vs player"
I should have known what the A was for in world-A ► Alpha testing - but that's a stage of testing that never leaves the lab/engineering facility - so I thought anyway - and even so Alpha testing is suppose to be before Beta testing - Somebody has gotten their wires twisted in a bunch - not to mention my drawers - lol
ps: if we all don't start laughing about this wildness - - I need to be extremely careful of the adjectives I choose to describe what is happening -- we will all go -- well - I can't say it -- choose your own adjectives -- just don't type them out.
Last edited:
1CCX
Private
well,you can see that I have arround 450%att/200%def in InA in beta server but I can asociate as a PMA player for the PMA unit's possession and their could reach only the 6-700 ranking....only the FE players or who have FE units at least can reach the x<500 ranking...who told you that we are not beta ?
i reached 7.500 CP in EMA and i start losing troops and having HMA-LMA as easy option, i got ranked ~2.200 among 2.500 total players and i think that the troop costs are starting to be over my affordable expenses, but that world is only a diamond farm with 100% attack and +4 troops daily from the villa.
maybe stronger EMA campers could reach 1000 ranking who knows - depends the world
FantasticMrFrank
Brigadier-General
I’m just under the 400 Ranking and I’m in TE
- Status