Actually there are a lot of divisons in which the guild fights, Guilds are grouped as per their no of members and this is also not fixed that they will have only 50 members each week or 60,63 , anything.I think it would be a good idea to have all worlds wide list of how well have guilds finished GE. Just like there is a list of highest ranked GB-s/guilds/players in every world. Maybe it could be either server wide or whole FoE wide.
But there may be unstability each week in the rankings because this is not fix that a particular guid may have 40 members each weekI must agree that yo have a point there indeed. I just thought that it would be lovely to see overall somewhere how all the guilds have done in GE, rather then going through leaderboards to see how they have done in the past. I can see that the amount of players in the guild varies always, but how many Guild Championships every guild has won still shows how much work they have put into it. Let there be then 80-60 player guild, then 60-40 player guild etc ranking list
The current system bases itself on amount of members in guild. Yes the current system is unfair. This has been brought up on several occasions and a more fair system would be if the system changed the amount of guilds in championship so all guilds have same amount of members.Ok. By this logic then current Guild ranking system is unfair and inaccurate also. There can be a guild consisting of 20 good players and hold first position in guild rankings when another guild with 80 players is at 20th position. Fact remains that number of wins in GE only shows how well, current players play together and it shows their achievement. There for I think that there could still exist a list of how well guilds have done in GE.
If the current system bases on how many members you got and groups up guilds that have same amount, then how is adding more guilds into championship gonna improve that? By that, the only change that would occur is the number of guilds that compete for the same gold trophy, which by the way would give guilds, that has less active players, even more lower chance to get even 3rd place. Frankly, it's the guilds problem if they have too many inactive players or players that don't want to do GE, why should the dev's take over the management of guilds?The current system bases itself on amount of members in guild. Yes the current system is unfair. This has been brought up on several occasions and a more fair system would be if the system changed the amount of guilds in championship so all guilds have same amount of members.
The % system is based on how many battles are needed for all members in a guild to complete GE.
In your example a guild of 20 would need 960 wins to get 100% each win being 0.104%, for a guild of 80 members 3840 wins to get 100% each win being 0.026%. Thus you see why it cannot be based upon guild level.
I think you misread what I wrote What I said was to have the system up or down the amount of guilds in championship so that all guilds have the same amount of members. Nothing about inactive members.If the current system bases on how many members you got and groups up guilds that have same amount, then how is adding more guilds into championship gonna improve that? By that, the only change that would occur is the number of guilds that compete for the same gold trophy, which by the way would give guilds, that has less active players, even more lower chance to get even 3rd place. Frankly, it's the guilds problem if they have too many inactive players or players that don't want to do GE, why should the dev's take over the management of guilds?
To be a bit on topic as well, if you want some kind of ranking, then how about the ranking of how many gold/silver/bronze trophies some guilds have already won?
We had an IA member who was completing level 2 every week with no attack GB's they are now EMA.
To me that shows more commitment than a CE member with level 10 aachen, zeus and cdm completing level 3.
And there you have said it, you are #1 guild. Try it from scratch. We are a guild less than 3 months old with just 10 members and level 16. All of our members take part in GE. I finish GE every week in about 2 days, I would not expect lower members to do the same. We do not have the resources to supply members with all the goods to negotiate at this time as we are in GvG too. We average 60-80% a week completion in GE depending on how active we are in setting up for GvG.Exactly my point. So having a high level CdM, CoA and Zeus wont make any difference. We have few very early age players in guild who finish GE 48/48 every week, despite having only less then 25% attack boost. Finishing GE successfully sometimes means negotiating and sometimes fighting. Sometimes doing one encounter 5 times if needed.
I would say that one can take a horse to water, they cant make them drink it. Every person must first want to help themselves and then guild can give a helping hand. And from here comes my final point, If a person is not even willing to help them self then they surely cant be a part of a competitive guild. That's where being a close knit community starts. People who help each other . That means getting rid of dead weight. That means guild working towards success. Either there is 80 members or 30 members makes no difference. What they have achieved in GvG and on weekly bases in GE shows their strength and willingness to be better.
My guild has many low age players who are great members and our guild helps them out every way possible. We are No 1 in guild rankings and we have 10 gold throphies in GE with 70 members, so I know what I am talking about in sense of working towards having a great team.
There comes my idea from of having a separate column alongside somewhere showing the amount of trophies won in GE. Not to show off but to recognize the achievement.
Guild is just under 3 months old.There I said it indeed. But is that not something that shows that those guilds who are all ready at some status have not worked towards GE winning. There might be 20 AF players in brand new guild and still to be able to help players in IA to finish GE and supply them with goods. GE negotiation does not consume hundreds of goods weekly for one person. Combine negotiation and attack and its all good. Which ever way you look at it, those guilds who get trophies in GE are working hard for them. Either they have to overcome and get rid of deadweight/ supply goods/ level attack GB-s. That all is effort. Everyone gets an equal starting block in this game. How they use it is completely different.
May I ask Markp27, how is your guild doing in GE? And how many people do you have in your guild?
LOL, seems like guilds are taking GvG a little bit too farspies being placed by another guild and information such as when less people were on was passed on to the other guild
Was much worse when you could actually delete defending armies instead of just replacing them.LOL, seems like guilds are taking GvG a little bit too far