Powe
Brigadier-General
What sort of poll?Is there a poll created asking people to vote? I can't find it if it has been.
What sort of poll?Is there a poll created asking people to vote? I can't find it if it has been.
Don't know how things are here, but in the beta forum, a poll gets shot down the moment it is put up because they feel it's redundant or something to that effect since they have a feedback thread.Is there a poll created asking people to vote? I can't find it if it has been.
I have a theory. People have been complaining for a long time that some players stay in low Ages and build big wonders etc so too strong for their level. there is Actually no incentive in the game to age up, and the opposite Is actually true. So inno change pvp to give everyone a reason to age up now to compete as you are fighting higher ages. The feedback they keep talking about but won’t tell us is not feedback about pvp but the feedback on players staying down Ages, which they have fixed With this and it would be why they won’t tell us the feedback.
If right that means they will eventually change gbg and gvg to do the same. If I am wrong inno tell us the real reason. Lack of facts means we will develop our own theories
Don't know how things are here, but in the beta forum, a poll gets shot down the moment it is put up because they feel it's redundant or something to that effect since they have a feedback thread.
Think people in the low ages will just stay as they are and take what rewards they already get from GE, GBG, GVG, it would take to much time to get to SAAB from Ema for instance,, if anything less people will play the PvP feature the costs out weigh the benefits to even try and compete with the Top End players to what they are probably already gettingI have a theory. People have been complaining for a long time that some players stay in low Ages and build big wonders etc so too strong for their level. there is Actually no incentive in the game to age up, and the opposite Is actually true. So inno change pvp to give everyone a reason to age up now to compete as you are fighting higher ages. The feedback they keep talking about but won’t tell us is not feedback about pvp but the feedback on players staying down Ages, which they have fixed With this and it would be why they won’t tell us the feedback.
If right that means they will eventually change gbg and gvg to do the same. If I am wrong inno tell us the real reason. Lack of facts means we will develop our own theories
It's never ignored. Giving feedback does not mean you will get the result you want. That does not mean it is ignored. It means the person/company you give feedback to appreciates your feedback, but does not see it like you.
Giving feedback also does not mean that the more you repeat it the more you are right and are likely to be heard. It does not give more meaning or power to the feedback if you repeat it 100 times. It remains the same feedback.
I’d go for the tavern boost aswell and say a prayer or two1 Spear fighter against user - ranked 12, 457Meg rank points (world-A) - I almost got off the starting line - lost 200 - lol - and he is still at the top of my battle list - it doesn't get any fairer than that - does it? SAAB opponent with 315%/2025% - and of course - nails to defend & attack with - Now I ask you all - what do we have to complain about - we are all just a bunch of babies --- where's that song I have
I’d go for the tavern boost aswell and say a prayer or two
who told you that we are not beta ?Using us to "Gather Additional Information" and happily taking everyone's medals, troops, diamonds, & money.
And they do it without shame. Now how could that have anything wrong with that -
At least in beta everybody gets a few thousand diamonds to play with - where's ours?
For devs it might be fun to develop such horrible thing.Well, I know a developers team that play their own created games and with pleasure !!
This is exactly the reason why I exitted the game 1,5 year agoo, for one year. Now I'm back for a while and can just see the same crap happeningwhat positive feedback? on what forum is there positive feedback about any of Innos recent feature updates? real positive feedback? all I see is negative, negative, negative, negative, negative, in every single one of Inno update threads, in 2 years I haven't seen someone say this update is great! gj Inno! ...
we just have to face it, Inno ignores their players and thats it, people should stop funding their pockets and we should start searching for a community where players are respected
who told you that we are not beta ?
i reached 7.500 CP in EMA and i start losing troops and having HMA-LMA as easy option, i got ranked ~2.200 among 2.500 total players and i think that the troop costs are starting to be over my affordable expenses, but that world is only a diamond farm with 100% attack and +4 troops daily from the villa.
maybe stronger EMA campers could reach 1000 ranking who knows - depends the world
i don't find the new feature a must, i will always do fights as long as i don't lose troops but up to there..
i prefer GvG as it is more "player vs player"
well,you can see that I have arround 450%att/200%def in InA in beta server but I can asociate as a PMA player for the PMA unit's possession and their could reach only the 6-700 ranking....only the FE players or who have FE units at least can reach the x<500 ranking...who told you that we are not beta ?
i reached 7.500 CP in EMA and i start losing troops and having HMA-LMA as easy option, i got ranked ~2.200 among 2.500 total players and i think that the troop costs are starting to be over my affordable expenses, but that world is only a diamond farm with 100% attack and +4 troops daily from the villa.
maybe stronger EMA campers could reach 1000 ranking who knows - depends the world
I’m just under the 400 Ranking and I’m in TEwell,you can see that I have arround 450%att/200%def in InA in beta server but I can asociate as a PMA player for the PMA unit's possession and their could reach only the 6-700 ranking....only the FE players or who have FE units at least can reach the x<500 ranking...