DeletedUser
Proposal:
Slight adjustment for Great Building rewards.
Have you Checked the Ideas section for the same idea posted by someone else?
Yes
Is this idea similar to one that has been previously suggested?
No
Details:
I've seen a lot of buildings where the 1st player donated bunch of FP at first, then the rest don't bother to donate, because the first player already pretty much has the top place. What I would like, is to have the rewards (maybe not the BP's) either double, or maybe x1.5 when the player is lets say 5 (or any low number) FP's away from the next place, or previous place. That way, will be more competitive, and we won't see as many GB stop building. So lets say GB requires 100 FP's. If at the end 1st place donated 50 FP's, 2nd 45 FP's, 3rd 5 FP's. The first 2 will have their rewards higher than normal, because they donated competitive.
Reason:
I have GB's that I donated to, stopped growing for weeks now, because donating additional FP's to that building will not change their rank.
EX: GP needs 190 FP's. 1st place donated 60 FP's, 2nd 45, 3rd 35, 4th 25, and 5th 15. So as of right now, donating additional FP's is a waste, because you only need 10 FP's to finish the GB, and doesn't matter who donates those 10 FP's nobody will change spots, not even a new player, because he will just end up in 6th place. So as of right now that building will just stay at that level until somebody decides to waste 10 FP's, and like I said, I have few that I donated.
So with my proposal, it will motivate more players to donate extra FP's, and since they will be so close to the next level, they reward will increase more than the normal. In my above example, 3rd can donate 5 FP's, and will be 5 FP's away from 2nd place, and 5th can donate 5 more, that will make him 5 FP's away from next place, they both get extra rewards, and the building is finished.
Abuse Prevention:
Don't see any abuse, other than having more competition in the game, having bigger risks, and more strategic, which (in my opinion) will be more exciting building other GB's.
Slight adjustment for Great Building rewards.
Have you Checked the Ideas section for the same idea posted by someone else?
Yes
Is this idea similar to one that has been previously suggested?
No
Details:
I've seen a lot of buildings where the 1st player donated bunch of FP at first, then the rest don't bother to donate, because the first player already pretty much has the top place. What I would like, is to have the rewards (maybe not the BP's) either double, or maybe x1.5 when the player is lets say 5 (or any low number) FP's away from the next place, or previous place. That way, will be more competitive, and we won't see as many GB stop building. So lets say GB requires 100 FP's. If at the end 1st place donated 50 FP's, 2nd 45 FP's, 3rd 5 FP's. The first 2 will have their rewards higher than normal, because they donated competitive.
Reason:
I have GB's that I donated to, stopped growing for weeks now, because donating additional FP's to that building will not change their rank.
EX: GP needs 190 FP's. 1st place donated 60 FP's, 2nd 45, 3rd 35, 4th 25, and 5th 15. So as of right now, donating additional FP's is a waste, because you only need 10 FP's to finish the GB, and doesn't matter who donates those 10 FP's nobody will change spots, not even a new player, because he will just end up in 6th place. So as of right now that building will just stay at that level until somebody decides to waste 10 FP's, and like I said, I have few that I donated.
So with my proposal, it will motivate more players to donate extra FP's, and since they will be so close to the next level, they reward will increase more than the normal. In my above example, 3rd can donate 5 FP's, and will be 5 FP's away from 2nd place, and 5th can donate 5 more, that will make him 5 FP's away from next place, they both get extra rewards, and the building is finished.
Abuse Prevention:
Don't see any abuse, other than having more competition in the game, having bigger risks, and more strategic, which (in my opinion) will be more exciting building other GB's.
Last edited by a moderator: