DeletedUser276
yah thats what I meant here
guess i wasnt eloquent enough
sorry. I think I was in a hurry when I posted my reply
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
yah thats what I meant here
guess i wasnt eloquent enough
sorry. I think I was in a hurry when I posted my replyDeletedUser
I would like to clear things up, it seems the players are saying server, but meaning to say world. EN is the server, Arvahall is the world. What you guys were trying to say at the beginning was merge worlds, not servers, transfer your city from say like Arvahall, to Brisgard, and things like that? This seems pretty neat, and I have seen games do this.
Not sure how easy, or hard it would be, and I am not sure FoE would ever do this, but still it would be neat.
Not sure how easy, or hard it would be, and I am not sure FoE would ever do this, but still it would be neat.
DeletedUser
My bad~! I have to apologize since I started this with the error of calling the early worlds, Early SERVERS Thank you for clearing this up, Herluth.
Thank you for clearing this up, Herluth.DeletedUser
Perhaps someone should let Checkered Jester Know?
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser3157
And I thought there are 7 EN servers, called "worlds"
Anyways it is sad if you are not looking forwards to ways making towns somehow transporteble(for example an optional "transfer" to a new optional "more competative" world etc) or not even considering merging into bigger (bigger=better) worlds as technoligy advances. I would assume there are multiple small worlds only because player numbers set technical problems for bigger worlds, and as such the end goal should always be working towards single huge world as it is the superior option and best final outcome a game could have. So despite your comments on it not happening Blacksmith, I still always hoped devs had some sort of merger ideas in the back of their minds.
Anyways it is sad if you are not looking forwards to ways making towns somehow transporteble(for example an optional "transfer" to a new optional "more competative" world etc) or not even considering merging into bigger (bigger=better) worlds as technoligy advances. I would assume there are multiple small worlds only because player numbers set technical problems for bigger worlds, and as such the end goal should always be working towards single huge world as it is the superior option and best final outcome a game could have. So despite your comments on it not happening Blacksmith, I still always hoped devs had some sort of merger ideas in the back of their minds.
DeletedUser3707
Anyone want to start a campaign for players to boycott a specific server, to see what the creators will do? >_>
DeletedUser276
Technically we are on the English Server... the world servers are sub servers run off the main server.
but we are getting a bit off topic here.
dont make me sit on you
but we are getting a bit off topic here.
dont make me sit on you
DeletedUser
Inactivity in FoE is not as big a problem(to a player) as in some other online strategic games. The game of an individual is so much less dependent on the activity of the others. Sure, the guild, neighbors, friends can make a difference in game, but it's not vital. One can prosper and enjoy the game on his/her own quite a lot.
The game is not about "Come and join other players to create empires, unite and fight together.......etc". It's very much individualistic.
Even at the peak of activity, the interaction between the active players is very, very low. Majority of players would at most reply to a message, but even though very active, the typical FoE player doesn't like to post in forums much (ever), support/polish a few.... or not. Attack only for quest and maps but rarely to blunder.
To the typical FoE player, a dozen guild members/neighbors going inactive will be barely noticed and felt even less. You could have 500 active players left and they would still be enjoying collecting coins and supplies for eternity
The game is not about "Come and join other players to create empires, unite and fight together.......etc". It's very much individualistic.
Even at the peak of activity, the interaction between the active players is very, very low. Majority of players would at most reply to a message, but even though very active, the typical FoE player doesn't like to post in forums much (ever), support/polish a few.... or not. Attack only for quest and maps but rarely to blunder.
To the typical FoE player, a dozen guild members/neighbors going inactive will be barely noticed and felt even less. You could have 500 active players left and they would still be enjoying collecting coins and supplies for eternity
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser4800
they just don't want to use resources combining two servers, not that it can't be done.
DeletedUser65
the problem is not the resources needed nor the if it can be down as we know it can, the problem is what to do with players who play on multiple worlds. lets say they merge arvahal and brisgard together. i play both those worlds but would only be allowed to carry one of them into the combined server as to not break the multi account rule. You can't force people(some of whom paid real money) to delete there characters.
And before anyone mentions changing the multi account rule, its there for a reason so lets not open that can of worms.
So the numbers may be down on the servers but is this not another reason we have merges?? so we will always have fresh players popping into our hoods,
DeletedUser
So the new world of Houndsmoore is up and running and this is where new players will go.........but what about cleaning up Brisguard??
DeletedUser276
each game world will get a huge boost of players once we add a few more updates and Marketing starts getting a good view of a closely finished product. I wouldnt worry about it. Marketing for us here is minimal till this happens. Guess this is what happens when people create accounts on multiple worlds then eventually stop playing on some.
I though have always been a firm believer that players should only have access to 2-3 worlds max per account. but thats my personal view.
I though have always been a firm believer that players should only have access to 2-3 worlds max per account. but thats my personal view.
DeletedUser
Ok that seems a good answer !