DeletedUser276
I beg you to reconsider the score "rebalancing."
read my previous posts on this that contain the words re evaluate.
I beg you to reconsider the score "rebalancing."
Leave the scoring as it was and stop protecting lazy players.
The Great Buildings being nerfed was poorly thought out and an insult to many that have purchased them.
Bad update. Less respect.
Where as players that dont want to battle all the time can opt out of guild wars.. everyone wins.
If you want to make the game more fair to those who don't want to "battle all the time," come up with other nonviolent ways to get more land expansions. Maybe like a system to reduce the time between FP's like schools and scholars instead of military buildings and units. Right now, schools, libraries, and academies only grant happiness. Battle is the only avenue afforded to accelerate city growth. If I saw another option for growth, I probably wouldn't be so aggressive myself. And I could better respect others' decision not to fight.
Urk... an almost unreadable wall of text that reads like an unmoderated stream of conciousness but to address the only point in there that I could see:
What score you get does not matter if every player uses the same scoring system. If you are competing with another player and you fight the same battles then the player who fights the better fight will score better and get a higher ranking. So, it does not really matter if you get 120 or 108 points for a spearman since everyone will get the same points.
Now, the guy who hasn't made it to trebuchets and uses catapults will get more than me for the same battle.
The update is here to stay folks. Over time if its reviewed as underpowered it will move back up. Until then though might as well get used to it.
hahahahahah reading all the complaints in this thread is funny. this update is a lot better than the ones I'm used to.
example: version 0.10.0 introduced 11 serious bugs to the game. This only introduced 4 or 5 less serious ones. Not bad at all.
If you read the complaints then how do you not realise that nobody is complaining about the bugs? The complaints are aimed at the fact that the update has changed things which in turn makes the game worse for majority of players. Things that had no reason to be changed were swapped around and screwed up and players are annoyed as they don't want the changes that have been implemented.
No, not everyone will get the same points. For expediency sake, I stick with my highest ranking offense and go through my list. I am anticipating what I'll need for my last 10 opponents. I don't want to have to change around for each and every opponent. That's a huge time waster. So, I got my trebuchets in there. Trebuchets are 4 ages beyond spearmen. If I lost 10% for one age difference how much will I lose for 4? Now, the guy who hasn't made it to trebuchets and uses catapults will get more than me for the same battle. Now, I'm punished for success. How much more for the players that have made it CA?
Across the board even reduction? I don't think so.