DeletedUser12400
I guess It's already time to build archers
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
- Status
BruteForceAttack
Warrant Officer
I guess It's already time to build archers
Atleast archers dont take 15secs to build, which is the main problem.
DeletedUser12400
True that however not a big fuss if you have a high level alcatraz.
BruteForceAttack
Warrant Officer
I doubt serious high age GVG fighters will go that route (yeah point farmers may do that), main issue was spear barracks and spearmen can be built in few seconds.
Blitz Epidemic
Warrant Officer
I've been there, done that on many games in the past. It gets old quick and very few players stay to participate. Perhaps Inno will start selling auto-defend/auto-attack bots on this game like they do their others, because only bots are left fighting after a couple of weeks.
klods hans
Tsar
Probably true, Blitz
DeletedUser96901
great idea
but then buildings must be adjusted too
Palace, Crows Nest and others need to be 4 hours buildings to make it really profitable
wouldn't make sense if you could plunder every 4 hours but buildings still produce on 24 hours
Ceban
Brigadier-General
max 3 recalcs during day, every 8 hours, maybe even 2 would be enough, 6 is pure insanity...
DeletedUser116025
I have a level 75 Traz and even that will run out of troops in a few days
Is that such a bad thing?
Then you are back at the level of players who do not have a Traz.
This could level the playing field a bit and make it more feasable and attactive for beginning players to enter the GvG maps.
DeletedUser10694
That is badly thought out. So your saying people who have invested time and effort into building high end GBs, like traz, should have no advantage for doing so, just so those lower down can have the same level playing field? That's a bit like saying the top 5% of the worlds wealthiest people should give most of there money to the 95% of the worlds poorer people so everyone can afford to buy a house. That being the case, why would anyone invest time or effort into getting rich?
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser116025
Idea: Adding a timer between attacks on a sector
I've read a couple of times that a 4hours turnover would give even less reason to invest in unlocking and placing additional DA.
And that it would give the opperunity to remove a guild with 50 sectors of a map within a day. Basicly that it is too fast.
What about the fact that for long time players with huge attack bonus it does not realy matter how many DA there are.
They can place a seige army and then hit auto-battle 80 times. Done deal sector counquered.
Less defending armies only means less points for them. So is it not already too fast and only for the happy few?
The small different in duration it takes for players with high attack bonus to conquer a sector with a couple of extra DA does not really help to give the defending guild time to destroy the seige army. They just need to be lucky to be online at the right time or be online all the time which is not healthy.
Not sure if this is proposed already but what if you get a delay for each user in between 2 attacks on a sector and no delay when defending.
That way it will be benificial to place and replace defending armies, so that the seige get prolonged and there is a better chance to fight them of.
It gives one active guild member the chance to fight of an attack providing he has enough units or fire power.
While the attacking guild can still take a sector within a minute if they manage to coordinate an attack with 80 guild members.
This delay can increase or be fixed.
It could increase based on the number of sectors a guild is currently owning.
It could be based on the age a player is in giving an advantage for the lower era players fighting higher era players.
It could increase with every attack a player makes.
I've read a couple of times that a 4hours turnover would give even less reason to invest in unlocking and placing additional DA.
And that it would give the opperunity to remove a guild with 50 sectors of a map within a day. Basicly that it is too fast.
What about the fact that for long time players with huge attack bonus it does not realy matter how many DA there are.
They can place a seige army and then hit auto-battle 80 times. Done deal sector counquered.
Less defending armies only means less points for them. So is it not already too fast and only for the happy few?
The small different in duration it takes for players with high attack bonus to conquer a sector with a couple of extra DA does not really help to give the defending guild time to destroy the seige army. They just need to be lucky to be online at the right time or be online all the time which is not healthy.
Not sure if this is proposed already but what if you get a delay for each user in between 2 attacks on a sector and no delay when defending.
That way it will be benificial to place and replace defending armies, so that the seige get prolonged and there is a better chance to fight them of.
It gives one active guild member the chance to fight of an attack providing he has enough units or fire power.
While the attacking guild can still take a sector within a minute if they manage to coordinate an attack with 80 guild members.
This delay can increase or be fixed.
It could increase based on the number of sectors a guild is currently owning.
It could be based on the age a player is in giving an advantage for the lower era players fighting higher era players.
It could increase with every attack a player makes.
DeletedUser116025
The players with a high end GB still have a major advantage.
With one collection of traz they can get more units than a lot of the other players can train on a single day. And with high attack bonus they prevent their units from getting killed when attacking.
only when placing seige and defending armies they will loose there units.
Ceban
Brigadier-General
so cause you haven't progressed in the game they should make way to reduce other players progress, is that what you try to explain to us?
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser96901
2 at the same time and many people still have the problem that they can't be there at both times
2 but every 11 hours would be interesting
so it is at a different time every day and more players have the chance that the time they play matches the time to battle
knycknac
Private
I have been an advocate of the 4 hour change and been thinking about all the comments made here and possibly found a solution
that will make the stronger guilds happy and keep the weaker guilds amused
For AA map ONLY when you attack and take sector you get an automatic 1hour protection only BUT you can buy extra hours protection up to reset
with medals at the hourly rate of the cost to attack another sector or something along the line of 100 per sector in AA -- 95 per sector in FE -- 90 per sector in TE and so on all the way down to IA
that will make the stronger guilds happy and keep the weaker guilds amused
For AA map ONLY when you attack and take sector you get an automatic 1hour protection only BUT you can buy extra hours protection up to reset
with medals at the hourly rate of the cost to attack another sector or something along the line of 100 per sector in AA -- 95 per sector in FE -- 90 per sector in TE and so on all the way down to IA
Ceban
Brigadier-General
what you dont understand that with 6 calcs per day nobody wouldnt be happy??? some really strong guild when it get bored just split into 5 guilds with 5 fighters and trust me they will decide who will be on top or who wont be cause 5 guilds with 5 fighters can delete anybody who they want inside 48 hours.
DeletedUser116025
It appears to me that INNO is trying to find a way to open GvG to more players.
And it is my believe that the 4 hour turnover might have a postive effect on this.
Although no-one can be sure how it really will turn out untill it is tested.
Your comment make me believe that you might be afraid that more players will be able to compete with you on the GvG map.
DeletedUser96901
I said 2 every 11h not 6
- Status