Xeon of Camelot
Major
I can totally understand the zoom being annoying especially on a mobile with no mouse zoom roller but it will be very sad if all the negative posts get the complete scrolling feature removed.
I can totally understand the zoom being annoying especially on a mobile with no mouse zoom roller but it will be very sad if all the negative posts get the complete scrolling feature removed.
I also hate the zoom but I do like the scrolling function, it suits my style of play.I use PC and the zoom is stupidly annoying. I can see my whole city at once on my screen but the zoom means I end up looking at a building i have just finished with, not one of the ones that needs my attention, one that i am done with. I honestly can't see a positive reason for this feature to exist.
Plus this is a feedback thread, if everyone is negative about a new feature it should be removed. That's the point of listening to feedback.
It would be very sad if they kept the zoom feature after 99% of people have pointed out how much they dislike it.
And no one is asking for the scrolling feature to be removed, they are asking for the option to disable it, which seems a very reasonable request.
As long as they remove the zoom, I'm happyI personally don't see a problem with an optional enable/disable. but if, say, only 1% of thousands and thousands of players dislike it, would Inno change anything, or add an enable/disable option for the minority?
Well, while they're at it when the fix this, they should remove the unnecessary zoom from the "idle building" too.I can only imagine that the zoom nonsense is because the devs are re-using old code to perform the collect function. It looks very much like the zoom you get when you click on the "idle building" icon. I bet they just re-used the old code instead of writing fresh code. It's just lazy programming and that approach will always lead to problems.
Eventually I guess they might change it (if they can work out how to do it) and then claim they are listening to their users.
An enable/disable option would be fine. But they still need to improve the "enabled" option then.
A lot of players have asked for something like this for a long time. Now they finally gave it to us. It doesn't work quite as well as it could have, but at least they gave it a shot. Now we're giving our feedback. Hopefully, they will give us an improved version in the near future.
It didn't I got my user name changed in Novembe.
Wasn’t your account purged from not being linked back in August?I need to check on this as it should have
I'm Deleted member 118885
No, it was linked I requested deletion.Wasn’t your account purged from not being linked back in August?
You can only change your name once every 180 days its not unlimiteddon't think we need unlimited changes though so maybe that could be changed to once a year or two.
Reference points 1 & 2 of improvements
These were omitted from 1.197 on Beta and are still not present on current version 1.198. Is this correct?
- From now on it's possible to change your username through the game settings
- You can now easily jump from a production building to another by simply clicking in the arrows (left and right). Also, upon clicking on a production option, it will automatically move to the next production building, so you don't need to open every building manually anymore
The best update was for the production not the username.How is it possible to get used to something that has taken away any control over our production buildings.
If I am producing different production times I keep them in groups. That is no longer possible now without having to exit the feature every time. Further more if you have different Era’s buildings (and you know that quests requests are sometimes for current Era and/or previous Era) you need to exit the feature to select the building or try scrolling but with scrolling you don’t know which building has been selected, you only know the Era and the building name. There is no way to select a group of buildings, the feature just selects the buildings in its own sequence.
The only way round it is to exit the feature each and every time you set a production thereby you can select the building that you want but that is defiantly not practical especially when you have a large number of production buildings from 2 or 3 Eras.
I don’t agree. The possibility to change your identity (username) every 180 days at will indefinably and this new production feature are more then enough to not make this the best upgrade for a long time.
The best update was for the production not the username.
I understand some people have more problem with the production, I just don't. So far.
Make it better? for sure. Optional or something.