DeletedUser109785
N/A
Last edited by a moderator:
-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
- Status
DeletedUser
I feel like this is totally unnecessary. There's already a confirmation to abort a quest and I don't know exactly what more people want? Well, this apparently. I don't feel like people should always be 'rewarded' and protected for not paying attention, quite honestly.
-1
-1
DeletedUser
Nothing, but I don't support ideas solely because I won't lose out on something if it were introduced. Sorry.
DeletedUser96901
but not supporting and being against something (= giving a -1) are two different things
I don't need it but also not being against it
that makes a 0 (neutral)
I don't need it but also not being against it
that makes a 0 (neutral)
DeletedUser107476
-1
There are main quests which cannot be aborted.
Then there are side quests which can be aborted and should be as they are not part of the main story.
What you are asking for is for side quests to become main quests and goes against what the game is about.
There are main quests which cannot be aborted.
Then there are side quests which can be aborted and should be as they are not part of the main story.
What you are asking for is for side quests to become main quests and goes against what the game is about.
DeletedUser
Yes, and I gave my reasons for giving the idea -1 as I am both against it and do not need it. The OP seemed to be suggesting that I should support his idea because I wouldn't lose anything from its implementation. If I did not have reasons to be against it, then I would be neutral also. I'm aware of how voting works, Test.
Last edited by a moderator:
DeletedUser
Maybe you should read it again then.
DeletedUser107476
Oh I read it, and realised that it would not work.
You may not have noticed but a lot of times rewards are under a ?
That means the option would be not to make diamond rewards non abortable but all side quests or the ? would have to cease to be.
Thus it would make all side quests main quests.
Logic states that this would be the case, and did not think that I would need to explain this.
DeletedUser97166
-1
Some people don't want to go through what some of the diamond quests ask for and therefore they want to abort. There are also quests that give random rewards, one random reward is diamonds, should these then be made un-abortable too.
Lexi was right when she stated there is a confirmation to aborting quests, people have to click twice to lose these quests, that should be more than enough.
Some people don't want to go through what some of the diamond quests ask for and therefore they want to abort. There are also quests that give random rewards, one random reward is diamonds, should these then be made un-abortable too.
Lexi was right when she stated there is a confirmation to aborting quests, people have to click twice to lose these quests, that should be more than enough.
DeletedUser12400
-1
In my opinion it's unnecessary option and developers in general seem to resist adding settings.
In my opinion it's unnecessary option and developers in general seem to resist adding settings.
DeletedUser109268
-1
Dude you said it it was your mistake and a mistake is meant so we can learn from it. This solution you are proposing seems to go against that. You do not want to learn from your mistake and thus paying more attention next time, instead you want to give more work to others (devs) and wasting our time here so you can keep on being distracted?
Interesting...
Dude you said it it was your mistake and a mistake is meant so we can learn from it. This solution you are proposing seems to go against that. You do not want to learn from your mistake and thus paying more attention next time, instead you want to give more work to others (devs) and wasting our time here so you can keep on being distracted?
Interesting...
DeletedUser720
-1
Adding stuff that doesn't hurt anybody, but helps a few people only bloats the source code of the game, eventually resulting in a slow game.
Adding stuff that doesn't hurt anybody, but helps a few people only bloats the source code of the game, eventually resulting in a slow game.
DeletedUser109385
I agree, if you don't learn from your mistakes you can have the same problems with other games as well and you can't just ask the devs to change it so because of this I am changing my vote to -1, sorry
DeletedUser12400
This thread has been archived.
- Status