Yeah - but at least if it's "what can I do about it" then they can't use the excuse that no one's helping in a meaningful way. They might not be able to control everything, but they can do a lot towards controlling the rules of their own city.
That's true.
I am very curious now what can you do?
Yell, scream, pulling your hair out (one by one).
I could start out by asking him if he was sure he wanted to start a war. I generally don't do that, though; the risk of it being misinterpreted as whining is significant. I might ask at some later stage, after a bit of successful retaliation, if he felt like calling the war off, but probably wouldn't do that, either.
You see, I can do a lot more than write letters.
Defensive measures I'd take are:
I already collect on time from the more significant buildings. However, with supplies I can get a bit sloppy, especially when the amount is minuscule, such as from Blacksmiths. So I'd improve my timing on that. Further, blacksmiths are cheap and require little space, so I'd build one extra, to accommodate the practical joker. Finally, I'd start switching the defense army around a bit, to force the attacker to fight manually and/or accept losses.
Defensive measures I could take, but would consider overkill, are:
Self-motivate my blacksmiths. Ask guild members and friends to motivate my blacksmiths. Buy the City Shield.
Of course, none of that would make him regret having plundered me. The regrets would come from my offensive response. No, I'm not talking about sending a nasty PM (though I bet I could write an obscenely offensive one, if I put my mind to it). In fact, as already stated, he probably wouldn't receive any PM from me. Instead, here's the offensive measure I'd take:
I'd simply plunder him.
Not for supplies, but for FPs and goods.
Every day.
Every time I ended up in his neighborhood.
For months, maybe years.
I know that this is what I'd do, because it's what I have done, and am still doing, to people who have annoyed me. I keep a "shitlist", and it's best not to get on it, because there's no known way to get off it. With some of the entries, I can't remember what they did to annoy me, but I still plunder them whenever I can.
Things I could do offensively, but would consider overkill (for a detail like this): Plunder every member of his guild that I could find. Have my guildmates and friends do the same. If his guild does GvG, attack them there. In the latter case, I might feel obligated to inform his guild's leadership of the background, which would require a lot of writing back and forth, and maybe even result in a boringly peaceful resolution. So, better not. Peace is for sissies.
There's a simple solution, run more blacksmiths than you need. If people are not taking simple steps to avoid things like that then quite frankly they deserve it
I agree on the last point. If I was the peaceful sort, I'd also agree on the first. It's just that leaving it at one simple defensive measure isn't my style. Well, maybe it could happen, if I was pressed for time. Probably not, though. Never has, so far.
The usual complaint is not "I'm being plundered, it's not fair".
The usual complaint (as in this case) is "plunderers only ever attack those who have no chance of fighting back".
The two are usually the same thing: "I'm being plundered, and that's not fair, because I have no chance of fighting back".
The last thing they want to hear is that it's entirely fair, that it's simply nonsense that they can't fight back, and that it's necessary for them to adapt their play to the game, which includes the co-players, rather than demand that the game and co-players adapt to their play. That last point is always what it comes down to: They don't want to play the game as it is. They believe they have a moral right not to be "bothered", regardless of the fact that they're playing a game where the rules explicitly encourage "bothersome" play.