• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account you need a forum account. You can
    REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation in to English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
  • We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply
  • Forum Contests

    Don't forget to check out the current contests here.

Suggestion

Gio158

Private
Some big player like to plunder then they put up the city shield boost.
This is a coward way to play we all should have a choice we attack or defend our city, not both.
It would make the game more interesting as the big boys will not hit and hideanymoe, if you attack is because you want to fight.
 

DeletedUser96901

already suggested:
not allowed to attack when city shield is active
 

Gio158

Private
That you cant attack a city with the shield on is fine then he should not be allowed to attack others
Is like the kid throwing the stone then going to hide
 

Emberguard

Legend
Attack and Defence are not mutually exclusive. Wanting to fight doesn't take away the need to defend

I'm not buying a shield for my opponent. If I buy a shield (never have btw) I'd be buying it for myself to benefit my city. No kingdom goes to fight and leaves their city undefended. They make sure no one's going to take it over in their absence. There's no way I'd ever support taking away attacking neighbours if you have a shield up or taking away the shield if you're plundering.

You have access to a shield yourself. If you need to protect your city you need to put in the resources to do that