• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can
    REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
  • We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply
  • Forum Contests

    Won't you join us for out latest contest?
    You can check out the newest one here.

New space, new opportunities, less limits and easier managements for servers...

Do you want more space to build new buildings, without changing the game principle?


  • Total voters
    6

DeletedUser112465

"Multiple votes are allowed."

100% are for your idea
50% are against it

No you cannot count like this, one Person can vote for different types of YES, but voting NO shows that problems noticed by many players are ignored/misunderstood, and solutions should exist because the work is done but not well used (few pay too much for too few benefits, many do not spend anything and spend time playing, and many do not play/do not benefit !

:lol:


maybe those also voted yes :lol:


that would proof that your idea should be made more understandable

Yes, it is being explained To those who ask questions but this group hundreedsds of ideas shown there and elsewhere...

because if people don't understand your idea that is not their fault.
it is your fault

:rolleyes:

The poll illustration by percentage is not useful/legal, it does not show the nmumber of persons who voted for one thing, they compare to the total of persons who took part in the poll and who gave at least one opinion, but it not positively contextualized (according to their habilities) and they can vote without reading and without understanding what it is all about (cf. 3 votes for NO as they say that more place is required but they do not tell which of the 4 YES options seam important to them, while this proposition allow all 4 improvements (less wastings, not more work, not more constraints, just more benefits and more efficiency to all players to progress in evolution...).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser112465

Can we please allow for the expression of opinion even if we do not agree with it. Continual counter argument is counterproductive.


I just propose a nice and effective way to have more space to build buildings and get more power to be more efficient on FoE to create more benefits to developpers, while making more players pay less then those who already do To buy diamonds or any package! We all need more benefits! Lot of things done cannot be used for now, and new nice buildings/rewards are always added, so proposing now a solution which can be realized in few hours and applied in few weeks will give opportunities for a better more open and accessible future!
 

DeletedUser112465

-1 as the developers have already said they have no intention at this time of adding extra expansions except by the usual methods. Please watch Facebook Q&A's as expansions are talked about nearly every one and is the same reply.

Yes, that is why I proposed then another way to put extensions somewhere else, because the main city cannot become much bigger, it is already large for small screens, they cannot increase the size of the window without changing lot of things, that is why they simply say they cannot add more extensions... But creating 1, 2 and perhaps 3 villages, would be a nice opportunity to put more production buildings in other places so that players can benefit of them!
 
Top