This is a repeated tactic of MAZ and is an illustration of how it is so difficult to play GvG fairly. If those of you who defend GGs feel it is OK please reflect on how you would feel if the same tactic was repeatedly targeted at you. We do not mind a fair fight but employing GG as part of your strategy leaves a very sour taste.
If I read your guild profile, then it's clear you target the big guilds.
PT is stronger than you, so PT moved you from the map to get that safe territory.
That 's the way GvG is done already for ages, and that's the way GvG shall be fought.
I'm not promoting GG's, but sometimes that's the only way to get a fair play. we all know how unballanced the siege goods are betwene a 20 sector guild and a guild with a few sectors is. I'm even not convinced that -V- wanted to get really a footprint in that area in TE. They just wanted to harm one big guild.... that's what I understood when I got contacted....
You wanted to change GvG, and made plans to attack big guilds (mainly PT) from different sides by different guilds.
Even I was contacted to join that alliance of different guilds.
Targetting only 1 guild in such a way, doesn't seem fair to me. I think you have to evaluate yourself if what you were doing was really fair. So don't be surprised that one way of playing the game at the limit of fairness, result in a reaction at the limit of fairness.
If you fight with respect to your enemy then you'll get a respectful fight back. That's how I experience the fighting in FD.
If you cross a line repeatedly... then everything can happen.