-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
DeletedUser112027
For pure early and then easy leveling attacking power as well as it’s super small footprint I add my vot to Zeus.
Stud.
E.
Stud.
E.
DeletedUser111359
I achieve the same end result with Tribal Squares, and Terrace Farms. On my main world I have zero double lane roads, zero goods buildings, and more surplus population than I could ever hope to use.
DeletedUser111359
Hard to say that Zeus is underrated, when anyone that participates in combat has one as soon as they get the BP's and levels it up quickly.
DeletedUser112027
Well. I play with guildies, waaaay beyond me in Points who have never built one.
But, like, whatevs.
Emberguard
Legend
Hagia Sophia is awesome to have. It's also gaining popularity more recently according to one of the other threads in this forum that did serveys on high ranking players favourite GBs.
The age old argument against Hagia is if you have a Alcatraz it's redundant for happiness and too big to be useful FP production
But if I went with that logic I'd never start a cape. It's worse then a Hagia without already having a high disposable FP income
Which is why you invest in multiple sources not the same source continuously. It may seem counter productive because then your investment is split between lvl'ing multiple GBS, but a variety of FP incomes give a greater output because of the low level requirements compared to one high lvl'd GB producing FPs for the same investment
The age old argument against Hagia is if you have a Alcatraz it's redundant for happiness and too big to be useful FP production
But if I went with that logic I'd never start a cape. It's worse then a Hagia without already having a high disposable FP income
Which is why you invest in multiple sources not the same source continuously. It may seem counter productive because then your investment is split between lvl'ing multiple GBS, but a variety of FP incomes give a greater output because of the low level requirements compared to one high lvl'd GB producing FPs for the same investment
Last edited:
DeletedUser112892
Well Cape has efficiency of Sok at lvl 5, while HS reaches that efficiency after 9077 invested FPs. I gree that for hapiness it is good GB.
I am considering to build HS, but no earlier than in FE.
I am considering to build HS, but no earlier than in FE.
Emberguard
Legend
That's only a relevant factor if you have the shrines to place in the first place and don't have a lot of space for another GB
It's far more difficult to avoid GBs because you're not at the most advanced era yet then to use whats available where you are and alter it later down the track.
It's really only relevant that the Hagia needs to be at lvl 15 for the equivalent efficiency to not build it if you only have the space to build one of the two. After all we lvl Arcs to lvl 80 and it's not until lvl 30 that it starts giving back consistent profit
It's far more difficult to avoid GBs because you're not at the most advanced era yet then to use whats available where you are and alter it later down the track.
It's really only relevant that the Hagia needs to be at lvl 15 for the equivalent efficiency to not build it if you only have the space to build one of the two. After all we lvl Arcs to lvl 80 and it's not until lvl 30 that it starts giving back consistent profit
DeletedUser653
I go for Oracle for new players only, costs 20FP to build and you have a quest to build ith with a reward of 20FP. either put no levels in it or maybe just 2 to give it 3-4 ages of life and then delete it
CF - great Gb but suggest you have to be doiung the reoccuring quests each age to really make it work well. Mines about L32 and climbing after i get TA up more
CF - great Gb but suggest you have to be doiung the reoccuring quests each age to really make it work well. Mines about L32 and climbing after i get TA up more
DeletedUser110531
Personally I see a few people try to hate on the Tower of Babble, I love it, any building that produces a ton of goods is great in my books. (Admittedly it doesn't produce much population but hey, its a 4x4)
Dead-Eye
General
I had the same thoughts till I got a CF.
DeletedUser111359
Babel has a couple problems for me. It gives you population, w/o coins, and coins are important. Everyone can always use more, since they can be converted into precious FP.
And if you get carried away leveling up your Babel, you could end up pinched for happiness, and in a real bind.
I have a Babel on one of my 5 worlds, and I'm in no hurry to bulldoze it. But I'm also not devoting any swaps at all to upgrading it currently.
DeletedUser112892
I agree with Richard. At the moment I got CF, I realised I don't need any other source of goods. As Tower of Babel is popular only because of goods it produces (which is low amount per 24h) I decided not to build it.
DeletedUser110531
I don't rely heavily on my CF or quest farm though, not got anything against people that do, its just not my play style.
DeletedUser111359
The Obs is only a good option, if you can't build an Arc instead.
DeletedUser112892
That's what I wanted to say too
DeletedUser96901
if you can't build the Arc quit the game
everyone can build the Arc if he wants
that is why so many players already have it in iron age