ddevil
Chief Warrant Officer
Hi I had this posted on another thread which is also relevant with this thread ...and I m posting the same here as this looks more active ...
I think the best solution will be to change the delete option completely and making it into a replace option (this option will have to compulsorily place an army if the previous army is removed otherwise the previous army stays)... Maybe only the leader & founder can have the delete option as an exclusive rights but everybody else should only have the option of replacing the army ... there's absolutely no necessity for the guild members to delete an army ....they only need to replace any damaged army ...thats the purpose of the delete option currently so changing it to replace option might solve the problem.... Only the leader / founder can decide to let go of a sector the guild holds and thereby can use the delete option ... SO maybe only they can be given those rights ...
Not an original idea of mine ... i think someone else had suggested this before and I am just trying to emphasis on it which seems to be a valid solution to me ...and as per Starzaan is already under review from the dev's side ....
I think the best solution will be to change the delete option completely and making it into a replace option (this option will have to compulsorily place an army if the previous army is removed otherwise the previous army stays)... Maybe only the leader & founder can have the delete option as an exclusive rights but everybody else should only have the option of replacing the army ... there's absolutely no necessity for the guild members to delete an army ....they only need to replace any damaged army ...thats the purpose of the delete option currently so changing it to replace option might solve the problem.... Only the leader / founder can decide to let go of a sector the guild holds and thereby can use the delete option ... SO maybe only they can be given those rights ...
Not an original idea of mine ... i think someone else had suggested this before and I am just trying to emphasis on it which seems to be a valid solution to me ...and as per Starzaan is already under review from the dev's side ....