• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can
    REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
  • We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply
  • Forum Contests

    Won't you join us for out latest contest?
    You can check out the newest one here.

New Idea: Letting non diamond players collect only 100 fp at a time is outdated.

Should we be able to collect 500 fp at a time.


  • Total voters
    10

Mydia

Private
Way back when the game started being able to collect 100 fps at a time made sense. Granted you can buy your way into faster collecting. But for those of us who don't spend money it seems that you could go at least 500 fp at a time.
 

Forwandert

Monarch
You dont need to spend money to use collect all. There are plenty of ways to earn 35 diamonds to cover collect all for a week.

500 fps won't achieve anything when single buildings produce more than 500 fps each. If it was a 10,000 fp limit it would still be a hurdle for a lot of players and they would get requests for it to be raised again.
 

Mydia

Private
You dont need to spend money to use collect all. There are plenty of ways to earn 35 diamonds to cover collect all for a week.

500 fps won't achieve anything when single buildings produce more than 500 fps each. If it was a 10,000 fp limit it would still be a hurdle for a lot of players and they would get requests for it to be raised again.

You dont need to spend money to use collect all. There are plenty of ways to earn 35 diamonds to cover collect all for a week.

500 fps won't achieve anything when single buildings produce more than 500 fps each. If it was a 10,000 fp limit it would still be a hurdle for a lot of players and they would get requests for it to be raised aga

You dont need to spend money to use collect all. There are plenty of ways to earn 35 diamonds to cover collect all for a week.

500 fps won't achieve anything when single buildings produce more than 500 fps each. If it was a 10,000 fp limit it would still be a hurdle for a lot of players and they would get requests for it to be raised again.
You dont need to spend money to use collect all. There are plenty of ways to earn 35 diamonds to cover collect all for a week.

500 fps won't achieve anything when single buildings produce more than 500 fps each. If it was a 10,000 fp limit it would still be a hurdle for a lot of players and they would get requests for it to be raised again.
I did not know that, when you scroll over the collect all button it says collecting is not possible unless you have less than 100 fp in your bar. I will try .
 

Droppy

Lieutenant-General
Non diamond players do not exist. You already spend diamonds during the tutorial.
 

DESYPETE

Captain
You dont need to spend money to use collect all. There are plenty of ways to earn 35 diamonds to cover collect all for a week.

500 fps won't achieve anything when single buildings produce more than 500 fps each. If it was a 10,000 fp limit it would still be a hurdle for a lot of players and they would get requests for it to be raised again.
so make the limit 100,000 its a simple problem to solve
 

Droppy

Lieutenant-General
I did, I said ‘good gameplay’ reason. All the reasons given don’t make sense for the modern game, they barely made sense back then.

Fact that you do not like them does not mean they do not make sense. Having the option to pay for something makes sense for every modern game.
 
Top