-
Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
-
We are looking for you! Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
DeletedUser99588
hmmm not sure what they mean by making GvG less complicated. It's not complicated at all just has a number of game mechanic flaws in it.
DeletedUser14782
Sooo... wonder what happens after the future...
Maybe FoE2?
Maybe FoE2?
DeletedUser2989
They mentioned a similar thing when they removed troop costs from sieges... perhaps "less complicated" really means "Improvements" (though some would debate that such changes actually improve...). None the less it's good to see continued work on GvG.
DeletedUser11899
If the main GvG problem has been always the large siege costs and their consequences (stalemate and ghost guilds), I wish Peer's team will work on this topic but who knows what they really have in mind. 
Anyway these news that Peer has told us are hopeful.
Lets keep our fingers crossed!
Anyway these news that Peer has told us are hopeful.
Lets keep our fingers crossed!
DeletedUser6065
Most telling point of the video is where Per stresses that the Devs do read the Forums.
So, there you pretty much have it. They read the problems. Presumably they understand the problems. Yet they do nothing about the problems.
Crappy customer service. I don't care how you slice it.
. . . mk
So, there you pretty much have it. They read the problems. Presumably they understand the problems. Yet they do nothing about the problems.
Crappy customer service. I don't care how you slice it.
. . . mk