A single attack on an allied guild which took place shortly after I pointed out your hypocrisy does not justify your point, nor does it support your supposed agenda. You give no comparable figures for the number of attacks on 'enemy guilds'. The fact is that the visible actions of the Elite are designed to advance your original guild and its allies by undermining the rankings of your rivals. There is no substantial evidence of indiscriminate attacks across the maps, indeed the one notable action on the PME map saw you pursue and take out a ghost guild (Ghostbusters)which threatened the flank of your major ally (Slayers), illustrating to all the true intention of your guild. It really is time that you dropped the pretense and admitted that all 12 of you who claim to be doing this for the good of the game, are simply in it to improve your individual rankings whilst supporting your parent guilds, as evidenced by your own statements. Stating that individual players choose to attack enemy guilds, but claiming that 'we attack all guilds' is a contradiction, reinforced by the fact that you can only claim a single attack by one individual upon an allied guild on a secondary map during what has been a very active period for your members. How can you possibly have a cohesive strategy when each individual player is allowed to do as he likes? This is hardly going to 'clear a map'.As already said, we attack all guilds. We have no alliance with any guilds and are free to attack anybody we want. Players at the moment have chose to attack their old guilds enemies, that is their own choice. The fact remains, if we want to attack other guilds who we were once allied with then we can/will. Just 2 days ago one of our members was attacking The Unforgiven on the modern era map. He chose to attack them and that was his choice, nobody argued it and nobody cared, we attack whoever and whenever.
Last edited by a moderator: