New Content Guild Battlegrounds (concept)

[Shad23]

thx for that :

The suggestion has been forwarded, as have any other suggestions raised so far.

 

[DeletedUser112087]

will be able to use VF,OF,AF goods in this new feature? its a shame that we have no way to use those goods in our treasury

 

[Deleted member 109369]

will be able to use VF,OF,AF goods in this new feature? its a shame that we have no way to use those goods in our treasury

From the question and answer page on the announcement

Treasury - what goods will be paid and how?
The Treasury Goods will be needed to build the Battleground Buildings on sectors your guild owns.
The needed goods will be random, depending on the highest member age of your guild. If one is in VF, than all goods until VF can be used. If the highest member in Iron Age, than only Iron Age goods will be used.

 

[DeletedUser112087]

also,is it possible that if this new feature goes well, and less players participate in GvG. will the current GvG get removed? because gvg is turning a lot of fighters off. in Cirgard the map have became a monopoly by Three Pointed Star. They have cornered all the great fighters. and nobody else stand a chance. plus you cant play on mobile,too many bugs ect.. I’d love to see this new feature eventually make GvG irrelevant. and bring pairity back to the game. it kinda makes no sense to run GvG and the new feature at the same time. you should want to bring everyone to either one or the other

 

[Shad23]

From the question and answer page on the announcement

Treasury - what goods will be paid and how?
The Treasury Goods will be needed to build the Battleground Buildings on sectors your guild owns.
The needed goods will be random, depending on the highest member age of your guild. If one is in VF, than all goods until VF can be used. If the highest member in Iron Age, than only Iron Age goods will be used.

thx for clearing that up

 

[Ceban]

also,is it possible that if this new feature goes well, and less players participate in GvG. will the current GvG get removed? because gvg is turning a lot of fighters off. in Cirgard the map have became a monopoly by Three Pointed Star. They have cornered all the great fighters. and nobody else stand a chance. plus you cant play on mobile,too many bugs ect.. I’d love to see this new feature eventually make GvG irrelevant. and bring pairity back to the game. it kinda makes no sense to run GvG and the new feature at the same time. you should want to bring everyone to either one or the other

LOL... cause of your incompetence that whole server combined kill one guild they should delete GvG to make you happy??? great logic... if whole server cant gather enough fighters to kill one guild then something is really wrong there...

 

[DeletedUser96901]

just convince developers to bring back gift option... ok?

it is not possible to bring back something that was never available


so you need to convince developers to implement gift option for the first time

 

[Deleted member 109369]

it is not possible to bring back something that was never available


so you need to convince developers to implement gift option for the first time

It never has been available. There was a button for a while but was never used and was removed eventually.

 

[Deleted member 109369]

also,is it possible that if this new feature goes well, and less players participate in GvG. will the current GvG get removed? because gvg is turning a lot of fighters off. in Cirgard the map have became a monopoly by Three Pointed Star. They have cornered all the great fighters. and nobody else stand a chance. plus you cant play on mobile,too many bugs ect.. I’d love to see this new feature eventually make GvG irrelevant. and bring pairity back to the game. it kinda makes no sense to run GvG and the new feature at the same time. you should want to bring everyone to either one or the other

As per the announcement, GvG is not being removed.

 

[DeletedUser]

not true, what is unfortunate is that some of the players with the highest scores are benefiting big time by this ridiculous hand out of watchfires and ritual flames and this is killing the small and mediocre point players that can't take revenge on them because it's like trying to make a hole on a concrete wall with a cotton earbud. they should stop this hand out and introduce attack objects so to balance this great inbalance that's completely out of proportion for some time now.
edit
take a look at the players with the most win battles and what do you see, watchfires and ritual flames for Africa, whole town full of them

If that were to happen it would be actively punishing people for being competent, experienced and dedicated Players simply because that is what they are. Rewards come to those who earn them, sometimes over many years active, enterprising and downright skilful play. Nothing comes to those who cannot or will not make the effort to deserve them.

 

[Deleted member 109369]

If there is a suggestion relating to the new feature regardling bonuses, please make it. Otherwise, we're verging into a broader discussion that what the thread is intended for which is to discuss the new feature, and ask questions.

 

[Ceban]

ok, there one sugestion, a ton of players produce literaly hundreds of troops per day, make some option that we can add troops in that sector and that with adding them we increase number of fights/negotiations wich enemies who are attacking us must do.

 

[Deleted member 109369]

ok, there one sugestion, a ton of players produce literaly hundreds of troops per day, make some option that we can add troops in that sector and that with adding them we increase number of fights/negotiations wich enemies who are attacking us must do.

As in being able to add defense to a sector?

 

[Ceban]

As in being able to add defense to a sector?

yes, troops can be placed in some building in that sector or for simple and easier programing it can just dissapear from our inventory and number of fight wich they must do increase for 1

 

[DeletedUser]

As per the announcement, GvG is not being removed.

I am pleased to read this, to judge from the number of appeals by GvGers there has long been a need for smoother running code to enable them to pursue their combat needs. It would be a shame to lose it and possibly its adherents. I and my Guild are currently far too puny to engage but, as we progress and grow, it would be something to look forward to in maybe a year or two.

 

[Deleted member 109369]

yes, troops can be placed in some building in that sector or for simple and easier programing it can just dissapear from our inventory and number of fight wich they must do increase for 1

Thanks. I'll check to see if that has been forwarded by another server and if not, I will add it to the list.

 

[Shad23]

got this on french server
- Un système d'alliance sera-t-il inclus aux champs de bataille ?
Pas pour le moment, mais une réflexion sera portée sur ce sujet.
translated means :
can a system of allys be included in GBG ?
not for now but devs will be discussing it between them

but
IMO nothing will stop 2 guilds who are already allys to help one an other on those maps if they are matched to be in the 5 guilds group you'll be in

 

[DeletedUser116322]

can a system of allys be included in GBG ?

very interesting point

 

[Deleted member 109369]

got this on french server
- Un système d'alliance sera-t-il inclus aux champs de bataille ?
Pas pour le moment, mais une réflexion sera portée sur ce sujet.
translated means :
can a system of allys be included in GBG ?
not for now but devs will be discussing it between them

but
IMO nothing will stop 2 guilds who are already allys to help one an other on those maps if they are matched to be in the 5 guilds group you'll be in

yes its part of the answers on the announcement page. It's definitely been raised . And I'll add your comment to it as well.

Will it be possible to play new style with allies or it is going to be very individual play style?
Guilds can agree to have a non-attack treaty when they end up together in a battleground.
For now, no explicit alliance system is part of this concept.

 

[Shad23]

on french forum they poasted a list of most asked questions about this new feature
with answers