DeletedUser110131
@Agent327
I always read the OP, and always what I reply to. In this case, my question was a reply to your interest in whether OP had mentioned defensive attack. After all, you wouldn't quarrel on the issue, unless it was relevant to you, would you? Not to mention, there's always the possibility that this new information might affect your position in the "Colosseum" topic, where you argue that the change is insufficient for the Colosseum to even justify it's size.
As for your stated reason, it doesn't take into account that not all players are "at the end of the game". It also doesn't take into account that any ideas here will be mere starting points, without fully fleshed out balancing. Something as simple as diminishing returns alone is enough to make your objection irrelevant. They could also throw in an option for a slight increase in offensive boost. It is, quite frankly, a pretty anemic objection.
I always read the OP, and always what I reply to. In this case, my question was a reply to your interest in whether OP had mentioned defensive attack. After all, you wouldn't quarrel on the issue, unless it was relevant to you, would you? Not to mention, there's always the possibility that this new information might affect your position in the "Colosseum" topic, where you argue that the change is insufficient for the Colosseum to even justify it's size.
As for your stated reason, it doesn't take into account that not all players are "at the end of the game". It also doesn't take into account that any ideas here will be mere starting points, without fully fleshed out balancing. Something as simple as diminishing returns alone is enough to make your objection irrelevant. They could also throw in an option for a slight increase in offensive boost. It is, quite frankly, a pretty anemic objection.
Edit is of some significance
Last edited by a moderator: