DeletedUser114342
Great you have wrote something like this.
Now why do most guilds dont bother with GE?
Obviously some change is needed.
Now to say something about end of your post.. if we were to compite like that every week, most of those strong guilds that can do 133.3 on hard week could not be able to do it every week. And then league would show which guild truly is the best. My guild has record of 113 gold, 16 silver and 3 bronze medals. And i dont remember when was the last time that we havent won gold. So most of this gold medals were won against guilds that havent had any chance to beat us. Real strenght of guild in GE would be shown if we would be put in same basket with guilds equally eager to win. League would required a bit if thinking and tactic, what matches to play with whole strength, and where you can relax a bit, depending on schedule.
I’m not sure why you say that most guilds don’t have a chance to beat your guild?
At the beginning of each week, all guilds start off in the same position. Your guild does not get any bonuses for coming in the top three the previous weeks.
In a way, your idea rewards those guilds that don’t do much GE over the guilds that do. So if guilds were ranked based on where they came in the previous GE, to start off with, you would get 10 guilds who do over 100% GE competing with each other. That means 7 of those guilds will not get any additional bonuses.
It also works in reverse, you will get 10 guilds who hardly do GE and the top 3, will get a bonus. I don’t think that sounds fair, do you?
Over time, you will still have the same issue as you are describing here. The guilds that are invested in GE will win over the ones that don’t.