DeletedUser100832
Proposal: At the moment, if you fight and your city is angry, you get a pitiful amount of ranking points. That doesn't sound fair: you should get the same number of points no matter what your city mood is. Same argument could be made for tower points as well.
Have you Checked the Ideas section for the same idea posted by someone else? Is this idea similar to one that has been previously suggested?
Doesn't seem to have been.
Details: As I've said, it doesn't seem very fair to get one amount of points for battles if your city is happy and another if your city is angry. You still fight the same battle and lose the same number of units. You could say that 'well, you should delete military/goods buildings and build happy buildings'. But then I could say, why not deduct points from fights if you don't have enough supplies buildings? Or houses? It doesn't seem logical.
I can at least understand deducting tower points for an angry city. But deducting ranking points seems illogical.
Visual Aids: N/A
Abuse Prevention: I suppose there may be people who delete happy buildings and fill their city with military. But tbh I see this as a strategic choice rather than a problem.
Have you Checked the Ideas section for the same idea posted by someone else? Is this idea similar to one that has been previously suggested?
Doesn't seem to have been.
Details: As I've said, it doesn't seem very fair to get one amount of points for battles if your city is happy and another if your city is angry. You still fight the same battle and lose the same number of units. You could say that 'well, you should delete military/goods buildings and build happy buildings'. But then I could say, why not deduct points from fights if you don't have enough supplies buildings? Or houses? It doesn't seem logical.
I can at least understand deducting tower points for an angry city. But deducting ranking points seems illogical.
Visual Aids: N/A
Abuse Prevention: I suppose there may be people who delete happy buildings and fill their city with military. But tbh I see this as a strategic choice rather than a problem.