+1, having ability to remove sieges will make GbG more organised.
So you want to interrogate guild members and possibly punish them for not doing exactly what you want.I dont we have a thread where we discuss strategy and tactics but not everybody reads it so there has to be the facility to remove the errors that some guild members make. I would also like a method where we could see who created the flag so they could be questioned as to why they took that action even though it had not been discussed.
a) why give your word for something that you cannot guarantee?actions of guild members who did precisely what I had given my word that they would not do
If you have received abusive messages they should be reported to support for the necessary actionas someone who has been receiving abuse
Why not? Great solution!Ofcourse it is a problem, but the solution isn't making you dictator.
Since when do you have veto rights?I veto this idea. The guild as a whole, should collectively work together to achieve its goal. If a member doesn't bother to read guild msgs, and attacks whichever sector s/he pleases, why would you want that member in your guild? Just remove that member.
I agree with that. I always tell my guild to keep alliances in GvG where they belong (they're just trying something new). I know what most allies are up to (already seen example of one), see Hunger Games. Anyways, back on topic, this thread needs a poll of "yes" or "no". LastWarrior?GBG is definitely designed more towards guilds standing on their own then it is for alliances.
I dont we have a thread where we discuss strategy and tactics but not everybody reads it so there has to be the facility to remove the errors that some guild members make. I would also like a method where we could see who created the flag so they could be questioned as to why they took that action even though it had not been discussed.Why do you feel that you should be allowed to force people to do what you want?
But which ones are the wrong players ?Ofcourse you would. If players do not read the threads, you have the wrong players. You should work on that. If they start an unwanted siege there is no problem with it at all, cause you can just ignore it and tell those that do read not to follow up on it. Only time it can ever be a problem is when you try to start an aliance with another guild and your members still attack that guild. In that case, if the placed siege is seen by them before you remove it, you might still have a problem. So why is this really needed, other than you can show you are telling everybody what they are supposed to do?
I guess you think you lead a guild.But which ones are the wrong players ?
There is currently no way of telling, I am guessing you don't lead a guild ?
I would like to change our Guild to open again but with the current state of GbG and the lack of support for leaders I cant do that :-(
That doesn’t tell you anything other then they deleted the thread.There is way of telling. You start a thread on the subject and make players that have read it leave the thread.