Common misconception of the "superior gender." As this is a forum, and on a game discussion thread, I will hold off my entire argument about this, but what I will say is that every person is equal, male or female. If they enter a game suited to city construction and a pinch of PvP, that is their decision and are subject to community interaction and conflicts. If the females get all the benefits of "full polish, no plunder," this creates a myriad of conflicts that I classify as advantageous over others. Sure, they are female, but it literally has no difference when they join an entire community of people that are playing by the rules. This idea would be very concerning in a game like Tribal Wars: leave a girl/woman to build up an empire, never attack her because it's a SHE. If anyone says otherwise, it's basically saying that "A physically capable male should be left unplundered over a young individual, because otherwise, that man will visit your house and put you in your place." Same gender, different capabilities. Although I do say you can't simply go to someone's house... hehehe...
Hint, I do understand what you written. Don't take the entire paragraph onto yourself.
As for the topic, yes this is male chauvinism, which is the idea of male superiority. I do agree with Bloodwyn to slightly modify that little line.
I don't want to get deeper in this topic. This would veer the topic to the wilderness a mile away from the road, and it wouldn't make sense debating about chauvinism on a game forum. Best leave this argument contained before someone unlocks the cages.
