• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can
    REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
  • We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply
  • Forum Contests

    Won't you join us for out latest contest?
    You can check out the newest one here.

Battle Commander

DeletedUser103052

Proposal:
A 'battle commander' unit, kind of like a General, they can be improved upon, their attack and defence increased through battle experience and diamonds. Of course each stat would have a cap depending on your age, but it would be a superior unit to all others of the same age, and strictly limited to one.

Have you Checked the Ideas section for the same idea posted by someone else? Is this idea similar to one that has been previously suggested?
Ideas have been presented on having units gain experience, but I believe the limiting of this to just the one unit and the abuse prevention sets this idea apart from them.

Reason:
This idea would cause more people to want to battle in order to get the max level on their battle commander, thus helping their defence through game play (Or diamonds, got to make it lucrative!).

Details:
There will be a single unit (Who cannot be lost if killed in battle) that is able to gain experience through offensive battles. This experience can then be used to increase the unit's health, attack and defence (Maybe even purchase a single ability). These gains would be capped (As to not would open all sorts of abuse) depending on your age. The battle commander would be better than any other unit of the same age, but still be challenged by higher age units. Each player could only ever have one, which cannot be lost or deleted.
Also, it could have a talent tree of sorts where the experience is spent, so people can tailor it to their specific play styles.
Examples of talents could include; +1% attack to all units in army. +1% chance of a critical hit. +5% health to the commander only. etc. (Better talents would cost more experience, naturally) and perhaps not all talents could be attained, so people would have to choose what they think is best/suits their play-style best.

Balance:
It will cause all players to have one stronger unit in their army, but all players would have one, and their stats would be capped.

Abuse Prevention:
Cap the values of health, defence, attack, speed (Everything) depending on the players age. Have only one unit per person that is permanent.

Summary:
A unit to lead your units in battle, stronger than any others of the same age and upgradable. A way to encourage more people to fight without giving too much of an advantage to those that do so religiously.
It also gives the opportunity for profit in the game, as diamonds can be used instead of experience.

Edit: In case it wasn't clear.. this unit CAN be killed in battle.. but it is not lost forever if it is killed (As is the case with regular units).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser110433

Nice idea but i`ll pass on giving plus or minus.
Only correction on ''Can not be killed'' I prefer if it CAN be killed, but it could be recruited in a special building, so IF it dies you lose accumulated experience and have to wait the recruitment time. This forks out diamonds, since if it dies you can spend diamonds on resurrection at end of battle screen (since it counts as healing 10 HP accumulated bonus is not lost)
 

DeletedUser110195

Put it on GE duty each week and then put it on defense where it can't die. This proposed unit sounds like an amped up champion.
 

DeletedUser109385

Similar ideas were suggested and they always got -1 votes for reasons which I can't be bothered to explain, it would be really unfair if this idea got lots of +1s while very similar ideas to this got lots of -1s. Because to make it look more fair to those people I give this idea a -1
 
Top