• Dear forum reader,
    To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can     REGISTER HERE!
    Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
  • We are looking for you!
    Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
    Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
    Apply
  • Forum Contests

    Won't you join us for out latest contest?
    You can check out the newest one here.

Do Not Suggest: Arc improved from GvG perspective

DeletedUser1622

I suggest to have a closer look to this game from Guild versus Guild perspective. Inno says that Guild versus Guild will not be cut off (in capitals!). But with so many negotiations goods became a problem. Especially lower era goods if we ask ambitious, evolved guilds. Rogues can fight in any uniform, right ? Alcatraz produces soldiers in iron armor or robots without any problem - correct ? I say that Arc should be switched to lower ages (only to lower !), once per week, at our will. Of course, we should admit a limit, so let's say that only an Arc level 80 or higher. I'd like to know the opinions from official's side. Because players evolves faster than before (I remember the situation 5 years behind), they go through ages quickly than ever and even if they have an evolved Arc, this structure don't produce what a guild actually needs, in accordance with the plans adopted in Guild versus Guild section.
 

kingrobert111

Major
dont understand OP,you dont use neg in gvg,from wot i've seen some players are to slow going up tech tree,there are more campers than ever before,now gbg is here loads more players will have stunted growth,on a newish world like rugnir its the main problem with the game,no trade at the top ect ect
 
Emberguard

Emberguard

Legend
First off it’s Do Not Suggest List. So if you put it in the ideas section it won't be passed on (wrong place to put it).

If you have feedback in regards to GvG it needs to be in the GvG announcement feedback thread


In regards to your idea itself - If you need goods try recruiting from players in or a little below the age you need that seem eager and doing FP swaps to get them treasury Great Building blueprints (if they don't already have the GBs)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top