Search results

Thread should be archived.

I agree. Though it seems insignificant, this is one small step towards making the game more accessible; something that is often overlooked by game designers.

Proposal Include Selection Kits in inventory search results if search terms match an item contained within the Selection Kit. E.g., when searching the inventory for, say, 'Heroes Tavern', the filtered results would include 'Heroes Tavern - LV. 1', 'Heroes Tavern Upgrade Kit', AND 'Epic...

Yes vote from me. Design consistency is good for UX.

I agree, and consistency is good from a UX perspective. Most popups close by clicking anywhere outside of them and I'd like to see all others behaving the same. Additionally, the smaller the click target (e.g., OK button) the less accessible the game is for users with vision or motor control...

Proposal: Add a confirmation dialogue box for the final event building upgrade, where there is a choice of final building type. This would require the user to confirm that they really wanted to build that building type, thus reducing mistakes. Have you checked the forums for the same or similar...

It seems that the progress bar on the Castle System screen isn't the right length. In this screenshot, the green bar should be about 60% complete according to the number of points required to reach 30,000. I have noticed this behaviour in Korch and Griefental. 1.217.4e47af1ca6f (10.11.2021...

115

I've now got 6 Emissaries to choose from in my Town Hall, but they're a bit secretive. It's obvious what some of their boosts are, like coins or supplies, but there's the one with the little target symbol, and the one with a Gas symbol, which are a bit obscure. Perhaps the game designers could...

Oh well, that was short lived. Can't be bothered following a template that's hard to find.

For example?

Suggest a lighter background colour for your own row in the Guild Event Contribution List. Would make it easier to find where you rank and it would be consistent with the GB contribution list. Easy to implement too. Have searched the threads and couldn't find this idea posted before.

Maybe I'm pedantic but I don't like the word "kicked" when a leader removes someone from a thread, e.g. "Seren233 was kicked by Thedor3". There are several reasons to remove a player, not all punitive, so the word "removed" would be more accurate and less violent. Perhaps the game developers...

+1 from me!

I think the idea is to suppress trades not marked as 'guild-only' from appearing the 'guild-only' filter on the trades list. Guild members would still be able to see the trades on the open list, i.e. if they don't apply the 'guild-only' filter.

Although my guild has members holding GvG positions from EMA - FE, the leaders focus on fighting in ME - FE, because that's the eras that they are in. I think it could lead to them draining the goods from the earlier ages, leaving early age players unable to contribute anything to the GvG.

+1

Then why mark it down if you don't have a reason to?

+1 I like the idea because I've also tried trading on the open market, where my ratio between goods of 1 age is not the obligatory 2 for 1 deal. Since most guild members only believe that 2 for 1 trading is fair - because that's what they've been told - I've been shot down in flames. This is...

Thank you lady-lexis. I never noticed the Event History filter before until you mentioned it, then I went looking for it. For those who haven't noticed it before, it's at the top left of the Event History window (at least on the PC version).