Dear forum reader,
To actively participate in our forum discussions or to start your own threads, in addition to your game account, you need a forum account. You can REGISTER HERE!
Please ensure a translation into English is provided if your post is not in English and to respect your fellow players when posting.
We are looking for you!
Always wanted to join our Support or Forum Team? We are looking for enthusiastic moderators!
Take a look at our recruitment page for more information and how you can apply:
Forum Contests
Won't you join us for out latest contest?
You can check out the newest one here.
ok, Lotus Temple and Oracle perhaps not the best example - but all the others are also not good anymore (compared to QI and Event buildings) - not looking good when new player sees it that game is outdated
also why are they introducing this feature - historic allies when Great Buildings is already broken/outdated by too powerful Events / QI buildings? Will they let us know who was this genius on Inno team?
in last year or so have deleted 9 Gbs... only 10 of my buildings still worth keeping value per 1 square wise in space age HUB:
Pegasus, Centaurus, Hydra
Cosmic Catalist, Stellar Warship
Arc
Arctic Orangery
Blue galaxy
Obs, Zeus
There was proposal at big attrition gain at GbG, how about only small attrition gain on GbG (even with 100%+SC support) and on GvG so its not mindless clicking anymore, so that all those new attack building is actually worth something
Some time ago you had put up pull to make GbG more difficult so that it would be no more mindless clicking - but some of players was against it - perhaps measures where too drastic, but how about some attrition gain even if it has full 100% SC support? perhaps 4% chance on 1 attrition gain, and...